Who primarily uses alternate fighting positions?

The correct answer indicates that crew-served weapons operators primarily utilize alternate fighting positions. This is because crew-served weapons, such as machine guns or mortars, require a stable position from which to operate effectively while also providing the gunner and crew a degree of protection and mobility. Alternate fighting positions are specifically designed to allow these operators to engage targets while minimizing exposure to enemy fire, enhancing both their survivability and combat effectiveness.

Crew-served weapons operators often have to change positions to avoid detection by the enemy and to adapt to shifting battlefield dynamics. Employing alternate fighting positions can help them maintain a tactical advantage while operating their weapons systems. This tactical flexibility is critical in a fluid combat environment where threats may come from various directions.

In contrast, while infantry soldiers and snipers may also make use of alternate fighting positions, they typically rely more on individual movement skills and tactics suited to their respective roles. Infantry soldiers might have a broader approach to cover and concealment, while snipers engage from positions that emphasize stealth and precision rather than alternate positions. Tank commanders focus on mobility and armor, using their vehicles for cover rather than seeking out alternate fighting positions like crew-served weapons operators do.