When compared to deadly force, non-lethal force is subject to what type of standards?

Non-lethal force is indeed evaluated under the same standards of objective reasonableness and the totality of circumstances as deadly force. This means that the appropriateness of non-lethal force, like deadly force, is considered based on the specific situation at hand, including the perceived threat level, the behavior of the individual being confronted, and the context in which force is applied.

The principle of objective reasonableness calls for an assessment of the actions of the security forces from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, considering the circumstances as they were perceived at the time force was used. The totality of circumstances takes into account all factors surrounding the incident, ensuring that the use of non-lethal force is justified based on a comprehensive view of the situation rather than isolated elements. This aligns both non-lethal and deadly force under a framework that prioritizes judicious and situationally appropriate responses.

In summary, the evaluation of non-lethal force mirrors that of deadly force, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of circumstances and reasonableness, which is central to the training and operational guidelines outlined in the SF Security Forces Training Reference Guide.