What is the level of force necessary to compel a subject's compliance that is neither likely nor intended to cause death?

The correct answer regarding the level of force necessary to compel a subject's compliance, which is neither likely nor intended to cause death, is intermediate use of force. This classification applies to situations where an officer must employ a reasonable level of physical force to gain compliance from a subject who is resisting or posing a threat, but the force used is not intended to inflict serious injury or death.

Intermediate use of force includes techniques such as physical restraint or control tactics that may cause temporary discomfort but are designed to subdue a subject without the risk of permanent harm. This level of force recognizes the necessity of maintaining control while prioritizing the safety of both the officer and the subject involved.

In contrast, deadly force refers to techniques or actions that are inherently likely to cause death or serious bodily harm; these are reserved for life-threatening situations. Minimal use of force would refer to the least intrusive measures, often involving verbal commands or soft physical touch, which may not be sufficient for compliance in situations of resistance. Excessive use of force exceeds what reasonable and necessary force should be in a given situation and can lead to serious legal and ethical consequences.