In the context of nuclear security, which group is NOT considered a primary adversary concern?

In the context of nuclear security, foreign dignitaries are not considered a primary adversary concern primarily due to the nature of their roles and the expected diplomatic protocols that govern their behavior. Foreign dignitaries typically operate under established international relations frameworks, which include respect for sovereignty and security agreements. They are usually engaged in negotiation and dialogue rather than hostile actions that threaten nuclear security.

In contrast, groups like criminals, protesters, and terrorists are often associated with activities that pose significant risks to nuclear facilities and materials. Criminals may seek to exploit vulnerabilities for theft or sabotage, while terrorists may target nuclear assets with the intent to cause harm or instill fear. Protesters may engage in actions that disrupt security operations or draw attention to perceived injustices regarding nuclear policies and programs, potentially endangering security. Thus, these groups are categorized as primary adversaries in the context of nuclear security, unlike foreign dignitaries whose interactions are generally managed through diplomatic channels.